Alabama Supreme Court Claims Cash Advance Company Not a Debt Collector

Alabama Supreme Court Claims Cash Advance Company Not a Debt Collector

The Supreme Court of Alabama has reversed a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff $200,000 in damages, governing on appeal that the Fair Debt Collection methods Act (FDCPA) would not connect with the pawn transaction at problem.

The actual situation, Complete Cash Holdings, LLC v. Powell, arose from the forged title-pawn agreement. Ms. Powell’s granddaughter took title to Ms. Powell’s vehicle, then, aided by the assistance of a Complete money employee, joined right into an agreement that is forged Complete Cash to pawn the truck. The granddaughter received $2,352 in money from Complete Cash, purported to give Complete Cash a security curiosity about the truck, and forged signatures in order for her grandmother ended up being obligated to repay the mortgage ( plus a finance cost) the following thirty days. All this ended up being done without Ms. Powell’s knowledge. The title-pawn agreement had been then extended many times for extra 30-day durations, and also the granddaughter made several re payments pursuant to your extensions. But the re re payments fundamentally stopped, and Ms. Powell’s vehicle ended up being consequently repossessed.

Ms. Powell later on brought suit against Complete Cash.

Among other claims, she brought claims underneath the Alabama Pawnshop Act (Ala. Code § 5-19A-1, et. seq.) and also the FDCPA. The trial court dismissed claims that are various test however it failed to dismiss the FDCPA claim, and so the FDCPA claim and lots of other people had been fundamentally attempted to a jury. The jury ruled in Ms. Powell’s benefit and awarded her $200,000 in damages.

On appeal, Complete Cash reiterated its argument that the FDCPA would not connect with the known facts of the case because Complete money is certainly not a “debt collector” as that term is defined underneath the FDCPA. Particularly, Complete Cash argued so it is a “creditor” (rather than a “debt collector”) under the FDCPA that it“is in the business of lending money to consumers by way of deferred presentment agreements and title pawns,” and. Continue reading Alabama Supreme Court Claims Cash Advance Company Not a Debt Collector